solution seems simple: require all submitters to also be reviewers.
They can't receive reviews on their own papers until their reviews are
submitted; if they don't submit them, their papers are automatically
rejected.
If you're worried about review quality, either assign enough reviews
to filter out noise, or assign a small group to spot-check the reviews.
I doubt that the quality of the accepted papers would change
dramatically; it would certainly be worth an experiment.
After all, this is supposed to be *peer* review, not *superior*
review...
--Rod

No comments:
Post a Comment