In terms of rules, it appears that, so far, the consensus seems to be toward clarifying or amending the rules, which would seem to be a charge to the TCCC leadership to represent that. I frankly would prefer that in such cases the leadership follows the IETF WG chair model, namely distinguishing whether they are wearing the chair hat or just making a contribution to the discussion as an individual.
For what it's worth, I also consider the CFPs a waste of human bandwidth, and would prefer an online (web) resource for items of interest to the community, including CFPs, books and jobs, desirable. TCCC has a webmaster who might be tasked with investigating this in more detail.
Henning
>
> There is some leeway, which is why, e.g., calls for chapters for commercial
> books are currently permitted. However, the "personal, financial, or business
> interest" clause currently prohibits calls for papers for organizations that are
> not demonstrably non-profit (this is a separate current ComSoc policy, FWIW,
> which I've previously investigated). I'll note that the examples provided under
> "general good" above are typically also non-profit related, which is where the
> note appears to make a distinction.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tccc mailing list
> Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
_______________________________________________
Tccc mailing list
Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
No comments:
Post a Comment