On 7/22/2010 1:07 AM, Sue Moon wrote:
...
> Conference or journal, if we could make sure that reviews are done well,
> why should it matter?
In a word, tenure (replace with whatever review process you prefer).
We're all reviewed in various ways. Asserting that "networking is
different", vs. other fields (either within CS, across engineering, or
throughout other disciplines) doesn't cut it.
IMO, we need to determine whether there's something about our work that
truly is unique and warrants <10% conference accept rates and long
review timelines - and make that case on its own merit (not just "that's
how it's always been"), or we should *adapt* to the common modes of
scientific discourse.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Tccc mailing list
Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment