> Except for tweaks ("slides" are now PowerPoint) and automation of the
> review process, the basic conference model hasn't changed in 20 years, so
> it might well be time to at least reflect on the objectives and see how we
> can improve things. I think our primary objective should be making
> research progress for science/engineering on important problems overall,
> rather than just turning the publishing system into a sports league.
How can we start reviewing our conference-driven practice
other than discussing it on this mailing list?
-Sue
_______________________________________________
Tccc mailing list
Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment