> quality control for conferences is way inferior to that of
> journals. And the reason for that is just the time limits and the
> impossibility of rebuttal and dialog to sort out disagreements.
I think that's a fair enough point. But, maybe:
- Our many conferences serve the same sort of purpose for
iteration---albeit in a looser and more distributed way (which has
pros and cons). So, in the aggregate we are seeing the quality
control.
- A more hybrid approach like the VLDB stuff is a better sweet spot.
I find it a very difficult problem to really reason about in the large.
I.e., what is globally "best" seems pretty difficult to say, to me.
allman
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment