> A related concern with IETF-style iterative reviewing is that the
> reviewer may end up contributing more than some of the authors. It is
> easy to imagine a conscientious reviewer going through many iterations
> with a student whose (co-author) advisor is preoccupied.
And if people are complaining about conference submission-to-publication delays of 5 months today, they will be thrilled when they see the 5-year delays from -00 I-D to RFC...
In general, without stating what you're trying to optimize and which problem you are trying to solve (quality? pick future faculty? timeliness? perception of fairness), the discussion of mechanisms seems a bit besides the point. To once again cite the IETF process: first, you need a requirements draft.
Henning
_______________________________________________
Tccc mailing list
Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment