>This particular experiment was indeed written up, except for the part
>about the number of papers submitted, which dropped by 50% and took
>*years* to recover. This happened in period when no other workshop or
>conference reported a similar effect, i.e., it wasn't just 'economic
>downturn'.
Just wanted to point out that the drop in the number of submissions is not necessarily a negative result. In some sense, this is a positive result if an average submitted paper was of better quality (?) than before.
Thanks
Mukul
_______________________________________________
Tccc mailing list
Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment